Influence of administration method on oral health‐related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile
Identifieur interne : 004732 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004731; suivant : 004733Influence of administration method on oral health‐related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile
Auteurs : Daniel R. Reissmann [Allemagne] ; Mike T. John [États-Unis] ; Oliver Schierz [Allemagne]Source :
- European Journal of Oral Sciences [ 0909-8836 ] ; 2011-02.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Collecte de données, Santé publique.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Administration method, Administration methods, Administrative method, Administrative methods, Anova, Clin epidemiol, Community dent, Community dent health, Completion rates, Current study, Daily performance, Data collection, Dental anxiety, Denture status, General health, General population, German version, Health measurement scales, Health status, Higher scores, Internal consistency, Intraclass correlation, John wiley sons, Life assessment, Lower limit, Materials science, Measurement error, Ohip, Ohip information, Ohip points, Ohip score, Ohip score variance, Ohip score variation, Ohip scores, Ohip summary scores, Ohip units, Ohrqol, Ohrqol assessment, Ohrqol assessments, Ohrqol information, Ohrqol instruments, Oral health, Oral health impact, Oral health impact profile, Oral healthrelated quality, Oral impacts, Oral quality, Oxford university press, Personal interview, Physical activity, Physical aspects, Previous studies, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic patients, Psychometric, Psychometric core properties, Psychometric properties, Psychosocial aspects, Public health, Qual life, Reissmann, Reliability, Review criteria, Score reliability, Score validity, Selfadministered questionnaire, Spearman rank correlation, Statistical methods, Study subjects, Telephone interview, Temporomandibular disorders, Variance, Variance component.
- Teeft :
- Administration method, Administration methods, Administrative method, Administrative methods, Anova, Clin epidemiol, Community dent, Community dent health, Completion rates, Current study, Daily performance, Data collection, Dental anxiety, Denture status, General health, General population, German version, Health measurement scales, Health status, Higher scores, Internal consistency, Intraclass correlation, John wiley sons, Life assessment, Lower limit, Materials science, Measurement error, Ohip, Ohip information, Ohip points, Ohip score, Ohip score variance, Ohip score variation, Ohip scores, Ohip summary scores, Ohip units, Ohrqol, Ohrqol assessment, Ohrqol assessments, Ohrqol information, Ohrqol instruments, Oral health, Oral health impact, Oral health impact profile, Oral healthrelated quality, Oral impacts, Oral quality, Oxford university press, Personal interview, Physical activity, Physical aspects, Previous studies, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic patients, Psychometric, Psychometric core properties, Psychometric properties, Psychosocial aspects, Public health, Qual life, Reissmann, Reliability, Review criteria, Score reliability, Score validity, Selfadministered questionnaire, Spearman rank correlation, Statistical methods, Study subjects, Telephone interview, Temporomandibular disorders, Variance, Variance component.
Abstract
Reissmann DR, John MT, Schierz O. Influence of administration method on oral health‐related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile.
Eur J Oral Sci 2011; 119: 73–78. © 2011 Eur J Oral Sci The influence of the administration method used to collect oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) data is largely unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether OHRQoL information obtained using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) differed with different methods of collection (personal interview, via telephone or as a self‐administered questionnaire). The OHRQoL was measured using the German version of the OHIP. The instrument was administered to each of 42 patients using three different methods, in a randomized order, about 1 wk apart. The test–retest reliability coefficient for the repeated OHIP assessment across the three methods of administration, and the magnitude of the variance component for administration method, were determined, characterizing the degree of OHIP score variation that is caused by this factor. Whereas OHIP mean score differences of 3.9 points were present between administration methods, the reliability coefficient of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85–0.95) indicated that 90% of the OHIP score variation was caused by differences between subjects (and not by the administration method or measurement error). The variance component for administration method explained 0.5% of the OHIP score variation. In conclusion, the method of administration (personal interview, telephone interview or self‐administered questionnaire) did not influence substantially OHIP scores in prosthodontic patients.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00805.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 004561
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 004561
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001677
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 004761
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 004732
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Influence of administration method on oral health‐related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile</title><author><name sortKey="Reissmann, Daniel R" sort="Reissmann, Daniel R" uniqKey="Reissmann D" first="Daniel R." last="Reissmann">Daniel R. Reissmann</name></author><author><name sortKey="John, Mike T" sort="John, Mike T" uniqKey="John M" first="Mike T." last="John">Mike T. John</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schierz, Oliver" sort="Schierz, Oliver" uniqKey="Schierz O" first="Oliver" last="Schierz">Oliver Schierz</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8BC0D3F079EC4CB1240BA7FB63A27F43E6061C64</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00805.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8BC0D3F079EC4CB1240BA7FB63A27F43E6061C64/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004561</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004561</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">004561</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001677</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001677</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0909-8836:2011:Reissmann D:influence:of:administration</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004761</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004732</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004732</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Influence of administration method on oral health‐related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile</title><author><name sortKey="Reissmann, Daniel R" sort="Reissmann, Daniel R" uniqKey="Reissmann D" first="Daniel R." last="Reissmann">Daniel R. Reissmann</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf, Hamburg</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Hambourg</settlement><region type="land" nuts="2">Hambourg</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="John, Mike T" sort="John, Mike T" uniqKey="John M" first="Mike T." last="John">Mike T. John</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, MN</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Minnesota</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schierz, Oliver" sort="Schierz, Oliver" uniqKey="Schierz O" first="Oliver" last="Schierz">Oliver Schierz</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics and Materials Science, School of Dentistry, University of Leipzig, Leipzig</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Saxe (Land)</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Leipzig</region><settlement type="city">Leipzig</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">European Journal of Oral Sciences</title><title level="j" type="alt">EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES</title><idno type="ISSN">0909-8836</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0722</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">119</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="73">73</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="78">78</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-02">2011-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0909-8836</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0909-8836</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Administration method</term><term>Administration methods</term><term>Administrative method</term><term>Administrative methods</term><term>Anova</term><term>Clin epidemiol</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Community dent health</term><term>Completion rates</term><term>Current study</term><term>Daily performance</term><term>Data collection</term><term>Dental anxiety</term><term>Denture status</term><term>General health</term><term>General population</term><term>German version</term><term>Health measurement scales</term><term>Health status</term><term>Higher scores</term><term>Internal consistency</term><term>Intraclass correlation</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Life assessment</term><term>Lower limit</term><term>Materials science</term><term>Measurement error</term><term>Ohip</term><term>Ohip information</term><term>Ohip points</term><term>Ohip score</term><term>Ohip score variance</term><term>Ohip score variation</term><term>Ohip scores</term><term>Ohip summary scores</term><term>Ohip units</term><term>Ohrqol</term><term>Ohrqol assessment</term><term>Ohrqol assessments</term><term>Ohrqol information</term><term>Ohrqol instruments</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral health impact profile</term><term>Oral healthrelated quality</term><term>Oral impacts</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Oxford university press</term><term>Personal interview</term><term>Physical activity</term><term>Physical aspects</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic patients</term><term>Psychometric</term><term>Psychometric core properties</term><term>Psychometric properties</term><term>Psychosocial aspects</term><term>Public health</term><term>Qual life</term><term>Reissmann</term><term>Reliability</term><term>Review criteria</term><term>Score reliability</term><term>Score validity</term><term>Selfadministered questionnaire</term><term>Spearman rank correlation</term><term>Statistical methods</term><term>Study subjects</term><term>Telephone interview</term><term>Temporomandibular disorders</term><term>Variance</term><term>Variance component</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Administration method</term><term>Administration methods</term><term>Administrative method</term><term>Administrative methods</term><term>Anova</term><term>Clin epidemiol</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Community dent health</term><term>Completion rates</term><term>Current study</term><term>Daily performance</term><term>Data collection</term><term>Dental anxiety</term><term>Denture status</term><term>General health</term><term>General population</term><term>German version</term><term>Health measurement scales</term><term>Health status</term><term>Higher scores</term><term>Internal consistency</term><term>Intraclass correlation</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Life assessment</term><term>Lower limit</term><term>Materials science</term><term>Measurement error</term><term>Ohip</term><term>Ohip information</term><term>Ohip points</term><term>Ohip score</term><term>Ohip score variance</term><term>Ohip score variation</term><term>Ohip scores</term><term>Ohip summary scores</term><term>Ohip units</term><term>Ohrqol</term><term>Ohrqol assessment</term><term>Ohrqol assessments</term><term>Ohrqol information</term><term>Ohrqol instruments</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral health impact profile</term><term>Oral healthrelated quality</term><term>Oral impacts</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Oxford university press</term><term>Personal interview</term><term>Physical activity</term><term>Physical aspects</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic patients</term><term>Psychometric</term><term>Psychometric core properties</term><term>Psychometric properties</term><term>Psychosocial aspects</term><term>Public health</term><term>Qual life</term><term>Reissmann</term><term>Reliability</term><term>Review criteria</term><term>Score reliability</term><term>Score validity</term><term>Selfadministered questionnaire</term><term>Spearman rank correlation</term><term>Statistical methods</term><term>Study subjects</term><term>Telephone interview</term><term>Temporomandibular disorders</term><term>Variance</term><term>Variance component</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Collecte de données</term><term>Santé publique</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Reissmann DR, John MT, Schierz O. Influence of administration method on oral health‐related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile.
Eur J Oral Sci 2011; 119: 73–78. © 2011 Eur J Oral Sci The influence of the administration method used to collect oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) data is largely unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether OHRQoL information obtained using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) differed with different methods of collection (personal interview, via telephone or as a self‐administered questionnaire). The OHRQoL was measured using the German version of the OHIP. The instrument was administered to each of 42 patients using three different methods, in a randomized order, about 1 wk apart. The test–retest reliability coefficient for the repeated OHIP assessment across the three methods of administration, and the magnitude of the variance component for administration method, were determined, characterizing the degree of OHIP score variation that is caused by this factor. Whereas OHIP mean score differences of 3.9 points were present between administration methods, the reliability coefficient of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85–0.95) indicated that 90% of the OHIP score variation was caused by differences between subjects (and not by the administration method or measurement error). The variance component for administration method explained 0.5% of the OHIP score variation. In conclusion, the method of administration (personal interview, telephone interview or self‐administered questionnaire) did not influence substantially OHIP scores in prosthodontic patients.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>District de Leipzig</li><li>Hambourg</li><li>Minnesota</li><li>Saxe (Land)</li></region><settlement><li>Hambourg</li><li>Leipzig</li></settlement></list><tree><country name="Allemagne"><region name="Hambourg"><name sortKey="Reissmann, Daniel R" sort="Reissmann, Daniel R" uniqKey="Reissmann D" first="Daniel R." last="Reissmann">Daniel R. Reissmann</name></region><name sortKey="Schierz, Oliver" sort="Schierz, Oliver" uniqKey="Schierz O" first="Oliver" last="Schierz">Oliver Schierz</name></country><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Minnesota"><name sortKey="John, Mike T" sort="John, Mike T" uniqKey="John M" first="Mike T." last="John">Mike T. John</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004732 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004732 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8BC0D3F079EC4CB1240BA7FB63A27F43E6061C64
|texte= Influence of administration method on oral health‐related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |